
ABOUT
REVENUE BONDS
Blending
fiscal responsibility with environmental goals turns out to be a
politically
popular approach. In San Francisco, the campaign to pass the
solar bond
was supported by organizations of every political stripe. The 73%
margin
of victory was the largest majority of any energy measure on the
ballot
in San Francisco history.
Investing
in Energy Independence
Until
now, solar power's promise--a clean, reliable, renewable and
distributed
energy source-has been denied by its price. Compared with the market
price of fossil fuels (which does not include the tax dollars we
spend
guaranteeing a fuel supply from foreign countries or health care
costs
associated with poor air quality), solar power is, in fact,
expensive
and currently does not compete favorably with fossil-fuel generated
electricity.
How,
then, can a city take advantage of solar's many benefits, without
paying
a premium over the current market price?
Bundling
San Francisco's model shows a clear and simple
way to make it work. Solar may be expensive, but energy
efficiency is
cheap. Wind power is, in many places, extremely cost competitive
with
other energy sources. The trick is to develop some projects with
shorter
payback periods, bundle them with solar, and evaluate the costs on a
whole-project basis.
For
example, when San Francisco issued the original plan for the $100
million
solar bond, $50 million was for solar projects, $30 million for wind
projects, and $3 million for energy efficiency technologies (the
remaining
funds go for debt service and other issuance costs). The energy
efficiency
projects have extremely short payback periods, and wind energy is
already
commercially viable. When these projects are bundled together,
the costs
for solar are effectively lowered. For more details on this, see the
Tools section.
Bulk
Purchasing
Buying in bulk reduces costs. In San Francisco's case, the size
of the
project was not just for bragging rights: lowering costs through
economies
of scale and the promise of developing a local solar
manufacturing base
were practical arguments for thinking big. One option is for
local governments
to coordinate with each other to pool their purchases, pushing costs
down even more.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
VoteSolar
Home | Contact
Us | Links
The San Francisco Story |
Why Solar? |
About Revenue Bonds
Tools to Help You |
Press